How these numbers are calculated
What each figure on this site is built from, how confident you should be in it, and where the simplifications are. Written so you can judge the numbers rather than take them on trust.
Tax figures come from published primary sources and are reproducible. Rate benchmarks are our own estimates, triangulated from marketplace ranges, adjusted salaried equivalents and publicly reported practitioner rates, and they carry no sample size or margin of error. Treat the first as calculation and the second as orientation.
The rate formula
The calculator solves for the revenue required to leave you with a target take-home income after tax and expenses, then divides by billable hours:
true hourly rate = (take-home target + business expenses + tax owed) ÷ annual billable hours
The complication is that tax owed depends on profit, profit depends on revenue, and revenue is what we are solving for. Rather than applying a flat estimated rate, the calculator runs a binary search over 60 iterations: it proposes a revenue figure, computes the exact tax on the resulting profit, checks the take-home against your target, and narrows until it converges. This is why the result responds properly to bracket thresholds instead of moving in a straight line.
United States tax
Three components, calculated in the order the tax code applies them.
- Self-employment tax: 15.3 percent applied to 92.35 percent of net profit, covering both the employee and employer halves of Social Security and Medicare.
- Federal income tax: computed through the real 2026 progressive brackets for your filing status, on profit less half of self-employment tax and less the standard deduction. Bracket figures come from IRS Revenue Procedure 2025-32.
- State income tax: applied as a flat rate using each state's top marginal rate, sourced from published Tax Foundation figures for 2026.
Two known simplifications. State tax uses the top marginal rate rather than each state's own brackets, which overstates the figure for lower earners in progressive states. Local and city income taxes, such as New York City's, are excluded entirely. Itemised deductions, the qualified business income deduction and retirement contributions are also not modelled, all of which would reduce the figure shown.
Tax outside the United States
Twenty-eight countries use a simplified three-tier effective rate model rather than full bracket data. Net profit is taxed at a low rate on the first $40,000, a middle rate from $40,000 to $100,000, and a high rate above that, with each country's three rates informed by published effective-rate comparisons for self-employed individuals.
This responds to income level, which a single blended rate would not, but it is an approximation and the tool labels it as one. Countries not on the list let you enter your own estimated rate instead.
Where the rate benchmarks come from
This is the part that deserves the most scepticism, so here is exactly what we do.
Each profession has one anchor number: an estimated mid-point hourly rate for an early-career freelancer, meaning two to five years of experience, based in the United States. That anchor is set by triangulating three things:
- Published ranges from freelance marketplaces and industry rate guides, which skew low because marketplace work is competitive, and which we treat as a floor rather than a centre.
- Salaried equivalents for the same role, converted to a freelance figure by adding self-employment tax, the benefits an employer would fund, and a realistic utilisation adjustment for unbillable hours.
- Rates practitioners report publicly in professional communities and published rate surveys, which skew high because people who publish their rates are not a random sample.
Where those three converge, confidence is reasonable. Where they diverge widely, which happens most in fields with very broad scope such as graphic design and consulting, the anchor sits nearer the middle and the true spread is wider than any single number can express.
These are estimates for orientation. They have no sample size, no margin of error and no claim to statistical validity. They are useful for answering "am I roughly in the right area", and not useful for answering "what is the median rate in my city". If you need the second, national statistics offices and published industry surveys are the right sources.
The multipliers
The anchor is adjusted by three multipliers. All are visible in the tool and printed on every profession page, so nothing is happening behind the curtain.
Experience
| Experience level | Multiplier | On a $75 anchor |
|---|---|---|
| Entry-level (0-2 yrs) | ×0.55 | $41 |
| Early-career (2-5 yrs) | ×1 | $75 |
| Experienced (5-10 yrs) | ×1.6 | $120 |
| Senior / Expert (10+ yrs) | ×2.2 | $165 |
Specialisation
Each profession has a small set of specialisms with multipliers between 1.1 and 1.5, reflecting scarcity of the skill and how close the work sits to the client's revenue. These are the most judgement-heavy numbers on the site and the most likely to move over time, particularly in fields where AI is changing which skills are scarce.
Region
Country multipliers are relative to the United States at 1.0, and reflect differences in client market and cost of living rather than any assessment of skill. A freelancer who sells into a higher-paying market can and should charge above their local multiplier.
| Country | Multiplier | On a $75 anchor |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | ×1.05 | $79 |
| United States | ×1 | $75 |
| Australia | ×0.9 | $68 |
| Canada | ×0.85 | $64 |
| Singapore | ×0.85 | $64 |
| United Kingdom | ×0.8 | $60 |
| Ireland | ×0.8 | $60 |
| Netherlands | ×0.8 | $60 |
| New Zealand | ×0.8 | $60 |
| Germany | ×0.78 | $59 |
| Sweden | ×0.75 | $56 |
| France | ×0.72 | $54 |
| Japan | ×0.7 | $53 |
| United Arab Emirates | ×0.6 | $45 |
| Spain | ×0.55 | $41 |
| Italy | ×0.55 | $41 |
| Saudi Arabia | ×0.55 | $41 |
| Poland | ×0.5 | $38 |
| Portugal | ×0.5 | $38 |
| Mexico | ×0.45 | $34 |
| Brazil | ×0.45 | $34 |
| South Africa | ×0.35 | $26 |
| Argentina | ×0.35 | $26 |
| India | ×0.3 | $23 |
| Philippines | ×0.3 | $23 |
| Indonesia | ×0.3 | $23 |
| Nigeria | ×0.25 | $19 |
| Pakistan | ×0.25 | $19 |
The billable hours assumption
The calculator defaults to 22 billable hours a week across 46 weeks, which is roughly 1,000 billable hours a year. This is deliberately lower than a conventional working year, because freelance weeks contain substantial unpaid time. The guide to billable hours covers how to measure your own figure, and why this input has more leverage on your rate than any other.
Corrections
If a figure here looks wrong, or a tax rule has changed and we have not caught it, the contact page reaches us directly. Corrections are made and the updated date on the affected pages changes with them.
About the data
Are these freelance rates based on a survey?
No, and we do not present them as such. They are estimates derived by triangulating published marketplace ranges, salaried equivalents adjusted for self-employment costs, and publicly reported practitioner rates. A genuine survey would carry a sample size and a margin of error; these figures carry neither, which is why they are described as orientation points rather than data.
How accurate are the tax calculations?
The United States federal calculation is accurate to the published 2026 brackets and standard deductions, and self-employment tax uses the statutory rate. Two simplifications remain: state tax is applied as a flat top marginal rate rather than through each state's own brackets, and local or city income taxes are excluded. For most people the result is close; for high earners in states with steeply progressive brackets it will overstate state tax somewhat.
Why is the international tax estimate less detailed?
Building and maintaining accurate multi-bracket models for thirty tax systems, each with its own social contribution rules, thresholds and currency, is beyond what a free tool can do responsibly. Rather than implying a precision we cannot deliver, non-US countries use a three-tier effective rate model that responds to income level, and the tool says plainly that it is an estimate.
How often is this updated?
Tax tables are reviewed when new figures are published, normally annually. Rate benchmarks are reviewed at least annually. The current data set is labelled 2026 and was last reviewed on September 11, 2026. Every page carries its own updated date.
Can I cite these figures?
Yes, provided they are attributed as estimates from The True Rate rather than as survey findings, and linked to the relevant page so readers can see the caveats. If you need a citable source for freelance rate data, published marketplace reports and national statistics offices are better primary sources, and we would rather you used them.